Pre-Induction Physical Exam

Still considering becoming a non-filer?  Before you make that  decision and crawl into the its cave you should first make sure you are  fit for one-on-one combat with the beast.

First, it is important  to know the rules of engagement.  In the cave the beast makes the rules,  the beast defines "reality", calls what is fair and foul, who is safe  and out and it owns the scoreboard.  If you do battle in the cave, you  cannot win.  Thus the only way to win is to wrestle the fight out of the  cave and into a courtroom with a jury calling the game, and that means  going "all in", risking everything.  A decision like that requires and  deserves some serious thought.    

Before anyone can decide  whether to do singular battle with the beast he needs to give himself a  pre-induction physical.  He has to weigh the damage he can do to the beast from outside the cave by engaging in risk-free activities against the risk of actually serving the beast as a head on its lance  to use to frighten the peasants.  He has to make an objective appraisal  of his strengths and weaknesses, of the risks taken and the return he  can expect to gain.

1.  Does he have a firm and thorough grasp of the law?

Not  articles, not seminars, books, videos or lectures, but the law itself,  primary sources only:  Statutes, Regulations, Supreme Court  Cases--without anyone else's spin or interpretation, and including an  understanding of the phony counter-arguments and what makes them phony.   If not, then he is not equipped with the knowledge he must have to  serve in personal combat.

2.  Does he have the communication skills to convince a jury?

Not  all of us are able to articulate our beliefs and our knowledge to  others clearly.  And not many of us are able to do so in a manner that  the jury will understand and see them as believable, especially when  that jury "knows" and has always "known" the exact opposite was "true".   If not, then he is not qualified to engage in one on one combat with  the beast.

3.  Does he have the nerve to stand the ordeal--the stomach for litigation?

Not  many do.  They think that they do.  They fantasize about being a  courtroom wizard, but do they really have what it takes to stand toe to  toe with a seasoned prosecutor and stand their ground?  Does he have the  ability to think not only on his feet, but on the run and under fire?   To avoid being rattled and lose his train of thought-control of the  situation?

4.  Does he have the resources or access to the resources it will take to win?

And  this means a lot more than money (and plenty of it).  He has to have  the energy to spend hundreds of hours honing and polishing his knowledge  and his presentation.  He has to have qualified and experienced  attorneys who know the terrain and can guide him to the target-an  acquittal.  He has to have the theatrical skills to put himself across.   He has to have support to allow him to do all of these things without  the distractions of everyday life.

5.  Is he willing to accept the consequences of failure?

One  should never bet money he does not have or gamble what he is not  willing to lose.  If he does, he is, in poker terms, playing with  "scared money" and scared money is "dead money".  If he is not willing  to go to prison, to lose everything he has or ever will have, then he is  not qualified to engage in singular combat with the beast.  The jury  will sense his fear, but they will interpret it as guilt.

So,  how did your pre-induction physical turn out?  Are you up to engaging  the fangs and talons of the beast?  Or are you better suited to attack  its lies and myths where it cannot fight back?  Where can you do the  greatest good?  As one who shines the light of Truth or as a potential  head on the beast's lance?

One final note: The paratrooper is an indispensible factor in winning a war, but not the only indispensible factor. What about the fellow who folded his chute?

Send This To Your Editor

Dear Editor:
It seems that Congress is always able to surpass its previous level  of  either chicanery or stupidity.  Either our representatives are  making a wedding  gift commemorating the unholy marriage between big  money and big government or  someone needs to hand it a sign saying "I'm  Stupid!"

The recent hand over fist outpourings of Americans' money to  lenders and  others have already exceeded a trillion dollars and now  they are considering  dishing out as much again to everyone except those  who need relief. The current crisis is that people are losing their homes and people  are  losing their jobs, making the purchase of goods and services  beyond their reach  which leads to more people losing their jobs and  unable to pay for their homes.   So, why are they giving the people's  money to banksters and corporations that  can afford to hand out 100+  million dollar bonuses to CEO's who have managed to  fail their  companies into government bestowed prosperity?  Give them their  signs.

Congress needs to put the water on the fire, not on the arsonists.   One  simple move could regenerate and stimulate our economy  without writing a single  check and would cost less than half in reduced  revenues of what they have handed  out and are proposing to hand out. It couldn't be simpler or more obvious:  Suspend the collection and  withholding of personal income tax, effective immediately. For no more than the initial $800,000,000,000 "bail out" to lenders  and  less than the current proposed "stymie us" plan, additional (and   earned) revenues can be instantly injected into millions of working  households  across the country.

No check writing, no administration, no  weighing  and balancing of requests and, most importantly, no printing  (and borrowing)  more phony dollar bills to further dilute the buying  power of working and  struggling American families.  Just distribution  would be self-effecting because  not one dollar would go to anyone who  had not already earned it. The impact would be felt on the first payday following the  suspension.   What would those earned dollars do for those in distress  as opposed to giving  truckloads of the money they've earned to  corporate and political cronies?  What  effect would that have on local,  state and national economies?  People who are  struggling to avoid  foreclosure on their homes may be able to save them (Wasn't  that the  problem?).

The economic boom would create the need for more workers to meet  the  increased demand for goods and services--people go back to work.   The boom would  also generate a spike in local and state tax revenues,  allowing them to reduce  their dependency on federal grants.  Isn't  being independent a good thing?   Isn't saving federal grant money a  good thing?  Give 'em their sign.What would happen to the revenues the federal government receives  (already  accounting for 70% of revenues) on its scores of other taxes?   Does the current  "stymie us" plan automatically pay itself back in  other revenues?  Give 'em  their sign.

Everyone needs to tell Congress to wise up, remove their "I'm  Stupid!"  signs and do what is best for America, its States and, above  all, the people it  is supposed to be serving.  Suspend the collection  and withholding of personal  income taxes effective immediately.

Real Stimulus Letter

Dear Senator _______ (or Congressman ________):

I am alarmed and angered by the nonchalant manner in which Congress has been doling out our money, even if it is phony money, FRN scrip, to "help" big business. You don’t put a fire out by rewarding the arsonist.

If you want to solve the problem with the economy, then get out of the way and let us take care of it. Suspend the illicit withholding and collection of the personal income tax from working American families, effective immediately. Just one year's suspension would be enough.

The advantages of leaving money instead of taking and giving money are apparent even to the least economically savvy citizen, so how can it escape you, unless your objective is something other than to do what is best for your nation, your State and your constituents. Is it?

• Put the water on the fire, not on the arsonist.
• The “cost” would be interest free, requiring no borrowing, and well below one Trillion dollars, a fraction of the hand-outs you are making or proposing to businesses and state and local governments, and would repay itself in increased revenues from other taxes.
• Federal revenues from the scores of other federal taxes would SOAR, recouping more than all revenue lost by suspending the illicit imposition of the income tax on working American families—JFK proved it, Ronald Reagan proved it and even George W. Bush proved that any cut in income tax results in an even greater increase in revenues from other taxes. (You didn't think the increased revenues were from the decreased income tax, did you?)
• No additional FRN’s would have to be printed, eliminating the inflationary effect of printing (and borrowing) more to reward failed policies and bad judgment.
• Stopping the weekly and monthly 20-30% rake off the top of every State’s economy, leaving that money to continue to build wealth and circulate in the economies that matter—ours—would allow those economies to prosper as they should (How long could you give a pint of blood every week?).
• Leaving earnings in the families that earned them will, without any expenditure, inject funds where they are most needed, permitting many to pay their house notes with their own money and reducing the foreclosures that are resulting from bad government policy.
• Since working families would be able to pay for more goods and services, unemployment would not only be reduced, it would be eliminated in months, not years or decades, andthe current Great Recession and its stagflation would be over.
• Eliminating the 40% penalty the personal income tax imposes on employers for hiring Americans, American labor would again become competitive in the world market, bringing many of the job's Congress has driven out of the country back home where they belong.
• Local, state and national economies would BOOM as a result of the weekly increases in household revenues across the country.
• Local and state tax revenues would SOAR as a result of the economic boom, permitting the States to operate without federal assistance. (You do want our States to be independent, don’t you?)
• Americans will be able to enjoy the standard of living they have earned by exercising their God-given, Constitutionally protected, tax exempt right to earn a living for themselves and their families.

You know these points are all true. The personal income tax makes about as much sense as picking all the apple blossoms and then wondering why the tree isn't producing apples.

Where are your priorities? With the people who elected you? With the State you represent? With the nation you are supposed to be serving? Or somewhere (or worse, someone) else? Is your "party" more important than your country? Is having a population that fears its government more important than having a prosperous nation?

Please introduce a bill to suspend collection and withholding of the personal income tax, effective immediately, and press it to passage. I, for one, pledge you my vocal and energetic support for such a bill.

Respectfully, but conditionally, yours,

Your name

Radio Talk Shows

Calling in the Question - The Double-Dog Dare

You have local talk shows in your town, so be a caller who asks about Truth Attack, giving the web site-then dare them to have Tom Cryer or Joe Banister or Devvy Kidd on as a guest, we'll give you everything you need to arrange the interview.

Talk radio is an open forum that takes only a few minutes and costs nothing to use, but we don't take advantage of it. A PR bird nest on the ground. Pick up the phone-call in.

Prepare for your call first, then call:

If you feel comfortable explaining the issues, fine, do so, but if not then play dumb. Ask the host if he knows anything about a group called Truth Attack and the Tax Honesty Movement. Tell him you've been reading information at www.truthattack.org (be sure you give the correct web site url) saying the IRS is lying to us about who owes income taxes.

How to respond to hosts response:

If he responds in the typical knee-jerk way, scoffing or ridiculing, ask him if he's ever read the Internal Revenue Code and if he says "No" say the people at Truth Attack dot Org (say the web site url again) have, so how can he be so sure about what he thinks the law probably says?

If he responds with government has to have taxes to operate, flip your flyer over and give him the list of how wonderful it would be for both us and the government without the income tax. Ask him why the government would insist on an income tax when it would receive more revenues without it?

If he responds with any interest, asking you questions, that is your cue to recommend that he get Tom Cryer, Joe Banister or Devvy Kidd on his show to explain it better than you can. All three are more than happy to grant interviews and will be able to answer any and all questions or rebuttals he can come up with.

Have some fun, get to talk on the radio and wake up a few thousand Americans, all at the same time!

If you have a group (more below on forming a group) make up a "tag team".

Plan your call ahead with your group. Agree on which day and which show you are going to call and make sure everyone has their talking points in writing. Decide on who is going to start the fire and then everyone else can pile on as a gasoline bucket brigade, calling in and verifying what the same caller said, backing him up.

The show's call screener may, after a couple of calls, try to screen any follow-up calls, so if that happens call the others in the team and let them know you're being cut off. Follow-ups can then say they're calling about something else, like a previous caller's issue to make it relevant to that show, and after making a comment about the stated issue, add "And, oh, by the way, that guy/gal that called in about Truth Attack dot org was right, and you should check it out."

YOU can be a CAUSE by placing a simple phone call. When thousands hear the truth the EFFECT of that will never go away, because once the Truth is out the IRS's myths and lies evaporate like fog under a hot sun. Stop living in the fog-rise above it and BE the SUNBEAM that melts it away!