Who Is Liable

(links go to FindLaw)


Federal taxes are collected from  those who are "liable"  for  the various  taxes imposed in the Internal Revenue Code. For  example, 26 U.S.C.  § 7601 commands that the Secretary of the Treasury  "canvass" the  various internal revenue districts to located those  "liable" to pay any  internal revenue tax:
Section  7601. Canvass of districts for taxable persons and objects.

(a) General rule.
The Secretary shall, to the extent he deems it practicable,  cause officers or employees of the Treasury Department to proceed, from time to time, through each internal revenue district and inquire after and concerning all persons therein who may be liable to pay any internal revenue tax, and all persons owning or having the care and management of any objects with respect to which any tax is imposed.

After taxes are assessed against  a taxpayer so liable therefor, the  Secretary must give notice and demand for payment thereof to persons  "liable" for the tax:
Section  6303. Notice and demand for tax.

(a) General rule.
Where it is not otherwise provided by this title, the  Secretary shall, as soon as practicable, and within 60 days, after the making of an assessment of a tax pursuant to section 6203, give notice to each person liable for the unpaid tax, stating the amount and demanding payment thereof. Such notice shall be left at the dwelling or usual place of business of such person, or shall be sent by mail to such person's last known address.

Tax liens authorized via 26  U.S.C. § 6321 are filed against  persons "liable" for the  tax:
Section  6321. Lien for taxes.

If any person liable to pay any tax neglects or refuses to pay the same after demand, the amount (including any interest, additional amount, addition to tax, or assessable penalty, together with any costs that may accrue in addition thereto) shall be a lien in favor of the United States upon all property and rights to property, whether real or personal, belonging to such person.

And the Secretary is authorized  to collect taxes from those  identified  as "liable" for taxes:
Section  6331. Levy and distraint.

(a) Authority of Secretary.
If any person liable to pay any tax neglects or refuses to pay the same within 10 days after notice and demand, it shall be lawful for the Secretary to collect such tax (and such further sum as shall be sufficient to cover the expenses of the levy) by levy upon all property and rights to property (except such property as is exempt under section 6334) belonging to such person or on which there is a lien provided in this chapter for the payment of such tax. Levy may be made upon the accrued salary or wages of any officer, employee, or elected official, of the United States, the District of Columbia, or any agency or instrumentality of the United States or the District of Columbia, by serving a notice of levy on the employer (as defined in section 3401(d)) of such officer, employee, or elected official. If the Secretary makes a finding that the collection of such tax is in jeopardy, notice and demand for immediate payment of such tax may be made by the Secretary and, upon failure or refusal to pay such tax, collection thereof by levy shall be lawful without regard to the 10-day period provided in this section.

The Internal Revenue Code imposes  in subtitle C several different  types  of employments taxes, and only one party is "liable" therefor: the  employer. The FICA tax is imposed in § 3101, and only  the employer is "liable":
Section  3102. Deduction of tax from wages.
(a) Requirement.
The tax imposed by section 3101 shall be collected by the employer of the taxpayer, by deducting the amount of the tax from the wages as and when paid. * * *
(b) Indemnification of employer.
Every employer required so to deduct the tax shall be liable for the payment of such tax, and shall be indemnified against the claims and demands of any person for the amount of any such payment made by such employer.

The Railroad Retirement Tax is  imposed via §  3201, and  it is the employer who is liable therefor:
Section  3202. Deduction of tax from compensation.

(a) Requirement.
The taxes imposed by section 3201 shall be collected  by the employer of the taxpayer by deducting the amount of the taxes from the compensation of the employee as and when paid. * * *
(b) Indemnification of employer
Every employer required under subsection (a) to deduct the  tax shall be liable for  the payment of such tax and shall not be liable to any person for the amount of any such payment.

The employment tax imposed via § 3402 that  provides for wage withholding makes the employer "liable" for it:
Section  3403. Liability for tax.

The employer shall be liable for the payment of the tax required to be deducted and withheld under this chapter, and shall not be liable to any person for the amount of any such payment.

And those who provide pensions,  etc, are considered employers who  are  "liable" for the deferred  wage/income payments they make:
Section  3405. Special rules for pensions, annuities, and certain other  deferred income.
* * *
(d) Liability for withholding.
(1) In general
Except as provided in paragraph (2), the payor of a designated distribution (as defined in subsection (e)(1)) shall  withhold, and be liable for, payment of the tax required to be withheld under this section.

And in certain circumstances,  certain third parties are "liable"  for  employment taxes:
Section  3505. Liability of third parties paying or providing for wages.

(a) Direct payment by third parties
For purposes of sections 3102, 3202, 3402, and 3403, if a  lender, surety, or other person, who is not an employer under such sections with respect to an employee or group of employees, pays wages directly to such an employee or group of employees, employed by one or more employers, or to an agent on behalf of such employee or employees, such lender, surety, or other person shall be liable in his own person and estate to the United States in a sum equal to the taxes (together with interest) required to be deducted and withheld from such wages by such employer.
(b) Personal liability where funds are supplied
If a lender, surety, or other person supplies funds to or  for the account of an employer for the specific purpose of paying wages of the employees of such employer, with actual notice or knowledge (within the meaning of section 6323(i)(1)) that such employer does not intend to or will not be able to make timely payment or deposit of the amounts of tax required by this subtitle to be deducted and withheld by such employer from such wages, such lender, surety, or other person shall be liable in his own person and estate to the United States in a sum equal to the taxes (together with interest) which are not paid over to the United States by such employer with respect to such wages.

Clearly, being made "liable"  for a tax via an express provision of the  Internal Revenue Code is very important.

Subtitles  D and E of the Internal  Revenue Code impose various  excise  taxes,  and excellent examples appear in these titles of sections of the  Code  that impose taxes and make specific parties "liable" therefor. For  instance, the tax on tires is imposed via § 4071:
Section  4071. Imposition of tax.

(a) Imposition and rate of tax.
There is hereby imposed on tires of the type used on highway vehicles, if wholly or in part made of rubber, sold by the manufacturer, producer, or importer a tax at the following rates:

Those "liable" for  this tax  are identified in the same section as  follows:
(b) Special  rule for manufacturers  who sell at retail.
Under regulations prescribed by the Secretary, if the manufacturer, producer, or importer of any tire delivers such tire to a retail store or retail outlet of such manufacturer, producer, or importer, he shall be liable for tax under subsection (a) in respect of such tire in the same manner as if it had been sold at the time it was delivered to such retail store or outlet. This subsection shall not apply to an article in respect to which tax has been imposed by subsection (a).

The section imposing the gambling  tax also identifies who is "liable"  for such tax:
Section  4401. Imposition of tax.

(a) Wagers.
(1) State authorized wagers.
There shall be imposed on any wager authorized under the law of the State in which accepted an excise tax equal to 0.25  percent of the amount of such wager.
(c) Persons liable for tax.
Each person who is engaged in the business of accepting  wagers shall be liable for  and shall pay the tax under this subchapter on all wagers placed with him. Each person who conducts any wagering pool or lottery shall be liable for and shall pay the tax under this subchapter on all wagers placed in such pool or lottery. Any person required to register under section 4412 who receives wagers for or on behalf of another person without having registered under section 4412 the name and place of residence of such other person shall be liable for  and shall pay the tax under this subchapter on all such wagers received by him.

Directly connected to this tax on  wagers is a tax on those  receiving  the wagers as an occupation tax:
Section  4411. Imposition of tax.

(a) In general.
There shall be imposed a special tax of $500 per year to be  paid by each person who is liable for the tax imposed under section 4401 or who is engaged in receiving wagers for or on behalf of any person so liable.
(b) Authorized persons.
Subsection (a) shall be applied by substituting "$50" for  "$500" in the case of -
(1) any person whose liability for tax under section 4401 is determined only under paragraph (1) of section 4401(a), and
(2) any person who is engaged in receiving wagers only for or on behalf of persons described in paragraph (1).

The section imposing a tax on  crude oil also specifies who is "liable"  for that tax:
Section  4611. Imposition of tax.

(a) General Rule.
There is hereby imposed a tax at the rate specified in  subsection (c) on -
(1) crude oil received at a United States refinery, and
(2) petroleum products entered into the United States for consumption, use, or warehousing.
(d) Persons liable for tax.
(1) Crude oil received at refinery
The tax imposed by subsection (a)(1) shall be paid by the operator  of the United States refinery.
(2) Imported petroleum product
The tax imposed by subsection (a)(2) shall be paid by the person  entering the product for consumption, use, or  warehousing.
(3) Tax on certain uses or exports
The tax imposed by subsection (b) shall be paid by the person using or exporting the crude oil, as the case may be.

A tax is imposed on distilled  spirits in § 5001:
Section  5001. Imposition, rate, and attachment of tax.

(a) Rate of tax.
(1) General.
There is hereby imposed on all distilled spirits produced in or imported into the United States a tax at the rate of $13.50  on each proof gallon and a proportionate tax at the like rate  on all fractional parts of a proof gallon.

Those who are "liable"  for  this tax are identified in §  5005:
Section  5005. Persons liable for tax.
(a) General.
The distiller or importer of distilled spirits shall be  liable for the taxes imposed thereon by section 5001(a)(1).

The tax on wines makes certain  parties "liable":
Section  5043. Collection of taxes on wines.

(a) Persons liable for payment.
The taxes on wine provided for in this subpart shall be  paid -
(1) Bonded wine cellars.
In the case of wines removed from any bonded wine cellar, by the proprietor of such bonded wine cellar; except that -
(A) in the case of any transfer of wine in bond as  authorized under the provisions of section 5362(b), the liability for payment of the tax shall become the liability of the transferee from the time of removal of the wine from the transferor's premises, and the transferor shall thereupon be relieved of such liability; and
(B) in the case of any wine withdrawn by a person other than such proprietor without payment of tax as authorized under the provisions of section 5362(c), the liability for payment of the tax shall become the liability of such person from the time of the removal of the wine from the bonded wine cellar, and such proprietor shall thereupon be relieved of such liability.
(2) Foreign wine.
In the case of foreign wines which are not transferred to a bonded wine cellar free of tax under section 5364, by the importer thereof.
(3) Other wines.
Immediately, in the case of any wine produced, imported, received, removed, or possessed otherwise than as  authorized by law, by any person producing, importing, receiving,  removing, or possessing such wine; and all such persons shall be jointly  and severally liable for such tax with each other as well as with any proprietor, transferee, or importer who may be liable for the tax under this subsection.
(b) Payment of tax.
The taxes on wines shall be paid in accordance with section  5061.

Specific parties are made liable for the beer tax:
Section  5418. Beer imported in bulk.

Beer imported or brought into the United States in bulk containers may, under such regulations as the Secretary may prescribe, be withdrawn from customs custody and transferred in such bulk containers to the premises of a brewery without payment of the internal revenue tax imposed on such beer. The proprietor of a brewery to which such beer is transferred shall become liable for the tax on the beer withdrawn from customs custody under this section upon release of the beer from customs custody, and the importer, or the person bringing such beer into the United States, shall thereupon be relieved of the liability for such tax.

The tobacco tax also makes a  specific party liable for  it:
Section  5703. Liability for tax and method of payment.

(a) Liability for  tax.
(1) Original liability.
The manufacturer or importer of tobacco products and cigarette papers and tubes shall be liable for the taxes imposed  thereon by section 5701.

Pursuant  to the commands of the federal Privacy  Act,  the IRS is  required to give a notice (contained in the Privacy Act  Notice or  Notice 609) of the various laws that require persons to  supply  information to it. The IRS Privacy Act Notice states: "Our legal  right  to ask for information is Internal Revenue Code sections 6001,  6011 and  6012(a), and their regulations. They say you must file a  return or  statement with us for any tax you are LIABLE for." To  determine whether one must file a federal income tax return,  one thus  only needs to study these 3 sections of the Code.

The first  section states as  follows:

Section  6001. Notice or regulations requiring records, statements, and  special returns.

Every person liable for  any tax imposed by this title, or for the collection thereof, shall keep such records, render such statements, make such returns, and comply with such rules and regulations as the Secretary may from time to time prescribe. Whenever in the judgment of the Secretary it is necessary, he may require any person, by notice served upon such person or by regulations, to make such returns, render such statements, or keep such records, as the Secretary deems sufficient to show whether or not such person is liable for tax under this title.

The second section provides as  follows:
Section  6011. General requirement of return, statement, or list.

(a) General rule.
When required by regulations prescribed by the Secretary any person made liable for  any tax imposed by this title, or with respect to the collection thereof, shall make a return or statement according to the forms and regulations prescribed by the Secretary. Every person required to make a return or statement shall include therein the information required by such forms or regulations.

Thus, the "general requirement"  for making a tax return is that,  first,  one must be liable for a tax. But WHO  is LIABLE for the federal income  tax? The federal income tax is found in  subtitle A of the Internal  Revenue Code and consists of sections 1  through 1563. You may download  a 2002 version of the entire Internal  Revenue Code here ( item  6 on this page, size: 1.34  Gigs).  Once downloaded, please  search the Code (particularly the  first 1563 sections) to determine who  is "liable" for the federal income  tax. The only section of the Internal Revenue Code that makes anyone "liable" for the federal income  tax is as follows:
Section  1461. Liability for withheld tax.

Every person required to deduct and withhold any tax under  this chapter is hereby made liable for such tax and is hereby indemnified against the claims and demands of any person for the amount of any payments made in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.

This party is the withholding  agent for nonresident aliens and  foreign corporations; see §  1441 and §  1442.  Withholding agents may be individuals, corporations,  estates, trusts, political  organizations, homeowners  associations, etc. These are the parties who are required to make  federal income tax returns pursuant to § 6012:
Section  6012. Persons required to make returns of income.

(a) General rule.
Returns with respect to income taxes under subtitle A shall  be made by the following:
(1)(A) Every individual having for the taxable year gross income which equals or exceeds the exemption amount, except  that a return shall not be required of an individual -
(i) who is not married (determined by applying section  7703), is not a surviving spouse (as defined in section 2(a)), is not a head of a household (as defined in section 2(b)), and for the taxable year has gross income of less than the sum of the exemption amount plus the basic standard deduction applicable to such an individual,
(ii) who is a head of a household (as so defined) and for  the taxable year has gross income of less than the sum of the exemption amount plus the basic standard deduction applicable to such an individual,
(iii) who is a surviving spouse (as so defined) and for the taxable year has gross income of less than the sum of the exemption amount plus the basic standard deduction applicable to such an individual, or
(iv) who is entitled to make a joint return and whose gross income, when combined with the gross income of his spouse, is, for the taxable year, less than the sum of twice the exemption amount plus the basic standard deduction applicable to a joint return, but only if such individual and his spouse, at the close of the taxable year, had the same household as their home.
* * *
(2) Every corporation subject to taxation under subtitle A;
(3) Every estate the gross income of which for the taxable year is $600 or more;
(4) Every trust having for the taxable year any taxable income, or having gross income of $600 or over, regardless of the  amount of taxable income;
(5) Every estate or trust of which any beneficiary is a nonresident  alien;
(6) Every political organization (within the meaning of section 527(e)(1)), and every fund treated under section 527(g) as  if it constituted a political organization, which has  political organization taxable income (within the meaning  of section 527(c)(1)) for the taxable year; and
(7) Every homeowners association (within the meaning of section 528(c)(1)) which has homeowners association taxable income (within the meaning of section 528(d)) for the taxable  year.
(8) Every individual who receives payments during the calendar year in which the taxable year begins under section 3507 (relating to advance payment of earned income credit).
(9) Every estate of an individual under chapter 7 or 11 of title 11 of the United States Code (relating to bankruptcy)  the gross income of which for the taxable year is not less  than  the sum of the exemption amount plus the basic standard  deduction under section 63(c)(2)(D).
except that subject to such conditions, limitations, and exceptions and under such regulations as may be prescribed by the Secretary, nonresident alien individuals subject to the tax imposed by section 871 and foreign corporations subject to the tax imposed by section 881 may be exempted from the requirement of making returns under this section.
(b) Returns made by fiduciaries and receivers.  
* * *
Relevant Cases
Drake v. United States, 355 F.Supp. 710 (E.D. Mo. 1973)

William Irvin DRAKE,


Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff,


Jack W. KLEIN et al.,
Third-Party Defendants.

January 10, 1973.

Michael J. Ebeling, St. Louis, Mo., for plaintiff and Third Party Defendant.

Daniel Bartlett, Jr., U.S. Atty., David W. Harlan, Asst. U.S. Atty., St. Louis, Mo., for the United States.


WEBSTER, District Judge.

Plaintiff  William Irvin Drake instituted this action to recover amounts paid on  account of taxes assessed by defendant United States of America.  Jurisdiction is based upon 28 U.S.C. § 1340 and 1346.

On August  14, 1970, plaintiff was timely assessed the sum of $98,116.45 respecting  plaintiff's wagering activities during the period October, 1965 through  and including February, 1967. Plaintiff paid the sum of $19.00 against  this total liability. On December 4, 1970, plaintiff was timely assessed  the sum of $189,879.66 respecting plaintiff's income tax liability for  the years 1965, 1966 and 1967. Plaintiff has paid the sum of $3.00  respecting these assessments. Plaintiff denies liability under the  assessments and seeks to recover the $22.00 paid in protest. Defendant  has counter-claimed for the $98,107.90 alleged to remain unpaid on  account of the unsatisfied assessments.

Defendant, as third-party  plaintiff, demands judgment against third-party defendants Jack W.  Klein, Jacqueline C. Klein and Samuel O. Swofford, severally, on account  of taxes assessed against their wagering activities, and entirely  unpaid.


Defendant asserts, as a  defense to Count II of the complaint, plaintiff's failure to pay his  income tax assessment in full before seeking refund of the $3.00 paid in  protest. Defendant's position is well taken. In tax disputes, the  taxpayer has the option of resisting a proposed deficiency assessment in  the United States Tax Court or of paying the full amount of the  assessment and seeking refund in the United States District Court. Sec.  6214 I.R.C.; Sec. 7422 I.R.C. A taxpayer may not seek relief in the  District Court until he can allege that he has made a proper claim for  refund which has been rejected and that the amount assessed has  previously been paid. Sec. 7422 I.R.C. A court does not have  jurisdiction over a refund suit where the taxpayer has not paid the  entire amount of the assessment. Flora v. United States, 362 U.S. 145,  80 S.Ct. 630, 4 L.Ed.2d 623 (1960). It therefore appears that this court  is without jurisdiction to entertain plaintiff's claim for refund of  income taxes under Count II, and Count II is hereby dismissed.


The assessments against  Drake, Mr. and Mrs. Klein and Swofford are based upon §§ 4401 and 4411  of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 (Title 26, U.S.C. §§ 4401 and  4411). Section 4401 imposes an excise tax on "wagers, as defined in §  4421, * * * equal to 10 per cent of the amount thereof." Section 4411  requires all persons liable for the tax under § 4401 to pay a special  stamp tax of $50.00 per year, with registration with the Internal  Revenue Service further required by § 4412. Section 4421 defines the  term "wager" to include "any wager with respect to a sports event or a  contest placed with a person engaged in the business of accepting such  wagers."

Section 4401(c) designates the persons liable for the tax as follows:

"(c)  [as amended by Sec. 151(a), Excise Tax Technical Changes Act of 1958,  P.L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1275] Persons Liable for Tax. — Each person who is  engaged in the business of accepting wagers shall be liable for and  shall pay the tax under this subchapter on all wagers placed with him.  Each person who conducts any wagering pool or lottery shall be liable  for and shall pay the tax under this  subchapter on all wagers placed in  such pool or lottery. Any person required to register under section  4412 who receives wagers for or on behalf of another person without  having registered under  section 4412 the name and place of residence of  such other person shall be liable for and shall pay the tax under this  subchapter on all such wagers received by him."

Sections 44.4403-1 and 44.6001-1 of the Wagering Tax Regulations require, in part, daily records of the following:

(1) The gross amount of all wagers accepted;

(2) The gross amount of each class or type of wager accepted on each separate event, contest, or other wagering medium;

(3) The gross amount of wagers accepted directly;  accepted by agents; accepted as laid-off wagers;

(4) Detailed information with respect to laid-off wagers; and

(5) The gross amount of tax collected from or charged to bettors as a separate item.

Where  persons liable for the tax imposed by Section 4401, fail to maintain  records as required in Sections 44.4403-1 and 44.6001-1(b) of the  Wagering Tax Regulations, the government is justified in estimating the  volume and extent of their wagering operations. Hodoh v. United States,  153 F. Supp. 822 (N.D.Ohio, 1957); O'Neill v. United States, 198 F.  Supp. 367 (E.D.N.Y., 1961); Pinder v. United States, 330 F.2d 119  (C.A.5, 1964). The burden of proof is on the person so assessed not only  to show that the amount of the assessment was wrong, but to produce  convincing evidence from which a proper determination of the amount of  tax due may be ascertained. Pinder v. United States, supra; Hodges v.  United States, 223 F.2d 140 (C.A.5, 1955); Hamilton v. United States,  429 F.2d 427 (C.A.2, 1970).

Neither plaintiff nor any of the  third-party defendants registered under the provisions of § 4412, nor  did any of them maintain the detailed records required by §§ 44.4403-1  and 44.6001-1 of the Wagering Tax Regulations. They contend that they  were not "persons liable for [the] tax" within the meaning of § 4401(c).

The  case was tried to the court. Drake testified that during the period  covered by the assessments he was working for Swofford as a runner, and  that Swofford was operating a "numbers" lottery. The "numbers" lottery  is a gambling operation, particularly popular among members of the black  communities of St. Louis and St. Louis County. The operator is  generally known as a policy company. In a customary operation, managers  in the local communities, acting as entrepreneurs, distribute lottery  sheets and other paraphernalia supplied by the policy company through  writers. The writers and managers work on a percentage of the take. The  cost to the bettor is usually small ($1.00 or less per bet). Briefly  summarized, the manager collects the winnings on the last lottery and  prepares a record of results on "hit" sheets and "take" sheets. Because  of a certain mutual distrust, the policy company exchanges the  "drawings" or list of winning numbers from the next lottery at the same  time it receives the material from the previous lottery from the  manager. This is frequently accomplished on neutral ground between two  slowly passing automobiles and is known in the industry as a  "cut-loose".

Swofford corroborated Drake's testimony and admitted  his operation of the wagering business. The court finds from the  preponderance of the credible evidence that Drake was paid approximately  $100.00 per week when he worked; that his function was to carry out the  "cut-loose" in the City of St. Louis for the policy company; that he  accepted no wagers and had nothing to do with the keeping of accounts or  records. He had no control over the operation and paid the taxes under  protest. In 1967, Drake was arrested and thereafter indicted by the  Grand Jury. He pleaded guilty to one count of engaging in the business  of accepting wagers as bookmakers without paying the occupational tax  imposed by 26 U.S.C. § 4411, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7203. Swofford  also pleaded guilty to accepting wagers and evading taxes due thereon in  violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7201 before Judge Regan, U.S.A. v. Swofford,  et al. E.D.Mo. No. 67 Cr. 102(3) (1967).

Mr. and Mrs. Klein each  testified with respect to their relationship to Swofford. In late 1966,  Swofford asked Klein if he could use his garage. Klein had an idea of  what was going on, and this was later confirmed. Klein testified that he  had no financial or proprietary interest in the operation or any  control over the draw. He testified that he was not engaged in a  gambling business. Mrs. Klein acknowledged that she occasionally helped  Swofford run adding machine tapes on some of the packages which were  later delivered to Drake. Occasionally Mr. Klein counted some money for  Swofford. He testified that these activities took place on an average of  three times per week. Both Mr. and Mrs. Klein pleaded guilty with Drake  to the charge of engaging in the business of accepting wagers as  bookmakers without paying the occupational tax imposed by 26 U.S.C. §  4411, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7203.

Mrs. Klein admitted that  on one occasion she went to Swofford's trailer and that she frequently  saw Drake at a bar which they both frequented. Both Mr. and Mrs. Klein  denied receiving any compensation from Swofford, and he testified to  like effect. Swofford testified that he showed his appreciation for the  hospitality extended by the Kleins by taking them out to dinner from  time to time and by providing other forms of entertainment for them. The  frequently played cards and drank before Swofford went to work.  Swofford testified that he had known Jack Klein for thirty years or  more. His purpose in using the garage was to work on his forms without  having to return to his trailer, which was located some distance away in  Jefferson County. Swofford testified that his modus operandi was  substantially as follows: he would leave his home between 9:30 and 10:30  a.m. and go to the trailer, where he would print result drawings until  12:00. He usually printed his winning drawings two days in advance in  case he should be incapacitated by his drinking. These sheets, printed  in advance, made him very vulnerable to his customers, and he took extra  precautions not to have them found. After printing the sheets, he would  deliver the city drawings to Drake at one of the bars. Drake made the  "cut-loose" in the city. Swofford generally made the "cut-loose" himself  in the county. After that, Swofford would go to the Kleins' garage and  work an average of two hours. At the Kleins he added up the top sheets  or prepared for the next drawing, cutting numbers, doing paper work,  etc. He testified that Drake did not know about the trailer. Swofford  customarily provided morning and afternoon drawings. At the end of the  day, he would review the take sheets in his home behind locked doors,  making corrections. Swofford testified that Drake had access to the  drawings prior to the "cut-loose" but that if anything went wrong that  would be his last time. He paid his managers once a week and further  testified that the manager was a free agent who could move elsewhere  with his clientele.

Special Agent Richard W. Carr of the Internal  Revenue Service testified that he had placed Swofford under  surveillance in the Fall of 1966, and his testimony with respect to  Swofford's comings and goings was consistent with the testimony of other  witnesses. He testified that he seized various wagering apparatus at  Swofford's trailer.

A somewhat lengthy recitation of the modus  operandi of the "numbers" lottery business has been made in order to  place the respective parties in their proper roles and to determine  whether, under the applicable statutes, any or all of them are liable  for the assessments made by the government.


Third-party defendant  Swofford. Swofford has acknowledged his participation, and there can be  no doubt but that he was a person liable for wagering taxes imposed by §  4401 and § 4411. He ran the business. He failed to register. He failed  to keep records, and he failed to pay the wagering taxes. On August 14,  1970, defendant was assessed by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue or  his duly authorized agent for the taxable period October 14, 1965 to  June 30, 1967 in the amount of $132.72 pursuant to § 4411.

Pursuant  to § 4401, the Commissioner timely assessed Swofford for the taxable  period October 14, 1965 — February 28, 1967 the sum of $98,070.45.  Third-party defendant Swofford has failed to prove that the assessment  was wrong and has failed to produce convincing evidence from which a  proper determination of the amount of tax due may be ascertained.  Judgment will therefore be entered in favor of third-party plaintiff and  against third-party defendant Swofford in the amount of $98,203.17.


Third-party defendants  Jack W. Klein and Jacqueline C. Klein. These parties have each been  assessed for the taxable period October 14, 1965 to June 30, 1967 the  sum of $132.62 pursuant to § 4411 and for the period October 14, 1965 to  February 28, 1967 and have each been assessed $97,982.15 pursuant to §  4401 for a total of $98,114.77 each party. The question presented for  determination is whether either Jack W. Klein or Jacqueline C. Klein are  persons liable within the meaning of § 4401(c). The government contends  that by furnishing vital auditing functions and a place of operation  the Kleins made themselves liable under this section. The key words of  the section are: "Each person who is engaged in the business of  accepting wagers" and "each person who conducts any wagering pool or  lottery * * *" (Emphasis supplied). A mere pick-up man or other employee  who has no proprietary interest in the operation and who receives no  wagers for his own account is not engaged in the business nor does he  conduct a wagering pool or lottery, and
is not liable for the tax. United States v. Calamaro,  354 U.S. 351, 77 S.Ct. 1138, 1 L.Ed.2d 1394 (1957); Ingram v. United  States, 259 F.2d 886 (5th Cir. 1958), affirmed in part, reversed in part  on other grounds 360 U.S. 672, 79 S.Ct. 1314, 3 L.Ed.2d 96; United  States v. Bowen, 411 F.2d 923 (5th Cir. 1969).

The government  contends that the guilty pleas by Swofford, Mr. and Mrs. Klein and Drake  before Judge Regan are admissions against interest which establish that  they were personally liable under § 4401(c). The court has considered  such pleas for what they are worth, and has accorded them very little  weight. At the time of plea, no questions were asked or answers given  touching upon the factual basis for the plea.[fn1] The parties testified  that they were advised to plead guilty by their attorney and that each  of them only knew that they did not have a wagering stamp. The plea,  under these circumstances, standing alone, is no evidence that any of  the three had any wagers placed with them or conducted a wagering pool  or lottery within the meaning of § 4401(c).

While the court does  not condone the actions of the Kleins in knowingly permitting Swofford  to perform certain functions of an illegal lottery in their home and in  assisting him in various minor ways, the court concludes from the  preponderance of the credible evidence that the Kleins were not persons  liable for tax within the meaning of § 4401(c). There was no evidence of  participation in the proceeds of the business or that either of the  Kleins had any control or management functions. They received no  compensation except such largesse as their friend Swofford saw fit to  bestow from time to time in terms of entertainment outside the home. One  may find the relationship between the three bizarre, but the court does  not find the testimony to be so improbable as to be beyond belief.  There was no evidence to the contrary. Accordingly, judgment will be  entered in favor of third-party defendants Jack W. Klein and Jacqueline  C. Klein and against third-party plaintiff on the third-party complaint.


William Irvin Drake.  Defendant claims that Drake played an indispensable role which enabled  Swofford to extend his business in the city while handling the county  business himself. The government stresses the trust imposed in Drake by  giving him access to advance materials. For reasons previously set forth  in relation to Mr. and Mrs. Klein, the court concludes that this  relationship was not such as to make Drake a person liable for the tax  within the meaning of § 4401(c). He was a paid runner, nothing more. He  was not conducting a lottery business, but was a mere employee having no  interest or participation in the proceeds of the business. Accordingly,  the court concludes that plaintiff Drake is entitled to recover amounts  paid by him under protest against the assessment for wagering taxes.  Judgment will be entered in favor of plaintiff and against defendant in  the sum of $19.00. Judgment on the counterclaim will be entered in favor  of plaintiff and against defendant. Each party will bear his own costs.

This Memorandum Opinion constitutes the court's findings of fact and conclusions of law.

So ordered.

[fn1] The criminal case pre-dated McCarthy v. United States, 394 U.S. 459, 89 S.Ct. 1166, 22 L.Ed.2d 418 (1969).

See also Fine v. United States, 206 F.Supp. 520 (Colo. 1962).



This material is not intended to be considered as legal advice, which can only be rendered with a complete knowledge of the facts of each unique case, nor is it intended to advise, recommend or encourage anyone to fail or refuse to file income tax returns or pay income taxes claimed by the Internal Revenue Service.